Potential Issues With the Growing Trend, AI Art
ติดต่อลงโฆษณา
Leaderboard in Content 1st
Fixed 1,000 baht/month
Slot 300 baht/month
AI art generator may seem like a lot of fun and entertaining at the first glance. Who wouldn't enjoy getting free art in just a few clicks? But now let's take a closer look inside. What are the steps in producing these works? Who owns the right? And how might it affect the artist?

Who deserves to own the copyright?

Copyright is a huge issue when it comes to AI-generated art. There are no copyright protections for works created by a machine, copyrightable works require human authorship. So who actually deserves the copyright? Is it the person or entity who created the AI generator? Is it the person who fed the images and carefully selected the right compositions from them, or is it the one who creates those works that are fed to the AI to learn how to create art in the first place?

 

Is AI-Generated art a theft

AI can't just make art out of their imagination unlike humans, so these generators have to use other people's art to learn how to make art. But the problem is most of the images that are fed to AI ​​have not been authorized by the author yet, which is an act that can be identified as theft.

If you use art that is AI generated personally such as using it as a wallpaper or profile picture may not be a big problem, but you should not use it for commercial use such as a book cover or selling the ai generated art.

 

Potential legal issues from AI

As I said, AI can't create art out of their imagination, all that is referenced from other arts or even personal photos that people have uploaded on social media is also included in the datasets used to train these AI programs. Lawsuits can arise from a person's inability to revoke access to their images and the potential misuse of these pictures to create fakes or participate in scams. SO REMEMBER, YOU CAN USE AI JUST FOR FUN AND ENTERTAINMENT, DO NOT USE IT FOR COMMERCIAL USE OR CLAIM IT AS YOUR WORK

 

Why do artists dislike AI, can we count AI-generated drawings as real works of art? 

Artists did not dislike AI-generated art because is not "real art". The definition of "real art" for each person is different so it's up to your point of view.

'Generally:

Artists don’t dislike AI art because it’s "not real" art etc.

Artists dislike AI art because the programs are "trained" unethically using databases of art belonging to artists who have not given their consent.

This is not about gatekeeping. This is about theft.'

tweeted by @Clerzi on Twitter.

 

Will AI be able to replace artists?

At the moment AI ​​cannot do as well as humans yet, these AI art generator ​​still needs to reference other people's drawings. But if AI can think and create works of art by itself, artists migth be replaced.